Who Else Thinks Cricket Technology Should Be Used by Umpires?

Cricket technology is starting to be used in the game.introduced it and the experiment was born.
Such cricket technology however, is being employedThe experiment falters because the TV umpire does
wrongly. It's a sad state of affairs when it looks likenot get the same privilege as the armchair spectator.
the only way England will snaffle 20 wickets in a TestThe TV umpire may look at what the ball has
is by the TV Umpire getting things continually wrong.actually done up to the point when it hits the
Ramnaresh Sarwan, in the form of his life, reachingbatsman, but may not look at the predicted flight of
184 not out at the close of play on day 3 has beenthe ball after it hits the batsman. Me in my armchair
somewhat overshadowed by some howlers from TVcould see that the Chanderpaul and Nash deliveries
umpire Daryl Harper.were missing by a distance but to Daryl Harper they
Whilst 'immovable force' Sarwan continues hismust have been touch and go. Had he had the full
imperious form with the bat drama transcended fromtrajectory and path after the batsman was struck
the other end with Shivnarine Chanderpaul andwould he have made the howlers?
Brendan sent wrongfully packing.The use of technology in cricket is an area of
First, he sent Shivnarine Chanderpaul on his way forcontroversy that would be very difficult to sit on the
70 to a delivery that would have cleared the stumpsfence with. My position is that of a strong advocate
by six inches; then he followed up this farcical noteof technology and it should be used to the full
by overruling the on field umpire, Aleem Dar to giveextent. The steady pace and somewhat leisurely
out Brendan Ash for a ball way over the stumpsstop-start nature of the sport we love is tailor made
once more. This bizarre course of events leftfor such technology. A TV referral system with
everyone involved in a state of shock with steamtechnology fully used does not in any way undermine
coming from the ears of West Indian coach, Johnthe on field umpire any more than the ludicrous
Dyson.system the ICC system has in place now.
As a pundit it is very easy to start pointing fingers atContrast this debate with a sport such as football
officials and people in the wrong. And I'll do that toand the arguments are much more grey in color. Goal
some extent in such a case, however whilst theline technology could be invaluable but would interrupt
Brendan Nash overruling is lamentable on Harper's partthe fast flowing style of football that has seen
it is in fact the means by which the ICC havecrowds marvel at. Not the case in cricket.
adopted the TV referral system into Test MatchHawkeye is being used in tennis to great affect and
cricket is the real culprit. The continual debategreat praise. In the Australian Open a month ago the
surrounding the system demonstrates that it's aeffectiveness of the referral system the tennis
botched ICC experiment.association has put in place was evident for all to see.
The inherent flaw of the system is that technology isSurely the ICC could put in place a referral system
not being utilized to its full potential. Hawkeyethat will work which harnesses the power of the
technology is widespread in the game now and istechnology and simultaneously reinforce the efforts
already part of the furniture. Its primary benefit is toof the onfield umpire.
give armchair spectators some closure on decisions.Bring in hawkeye properly and utilize hotshot. At the
It has been acknowledged that it could be used tohighest level these technologies can be a godsend.
adjudicate lbw decisions and with that notion the ICC