Umpires Over Technology - Dinosaurs In 21st Century Cricket

In an era when we read about corporateIn Antigua, one of Cricket's newest and most
scandals--including former reputable bank managers,exciting forms of the game, Stanford 2020 Cricket
highly respectable pastors and trustworthywas played nightly over three months, to the
politicians-- cricket has established a Mount Olympusbackdrop of top Caribbean stars, visiting movie stars,
of virtue: a list of elite umpires in a mythical tower ofand yes-even Eli Manning, who was treated to the
infallibility. The last time I checked the list of Popes,rudiments of Baseball's sister-game. During the Nevis
from their inception by the Cardinal of Bishops invs. Jamaica game, Nevis had Jamaica struggling in the
1099, history could have difficulty assigning thefirst five overs. When the umpire failed to give Chris
adverb "respectful" to names of corrupt Popes likeGayle out L.B.W, the ghost of big island/small island
Pope Pius 111, Pope Fernan Martin V, and Pope Philipinjustice ran on the filed and killed the spirit of the
Le Bel or "Fair Philip" 1285-1314. Let us not forget thatgame. Jamaica narrowly won the game. In like
the only non-Muslim male that the Holy Koran cites asmanner, the tempo of the Barbados game changed
an example of Pious living, Isa Ibm Miriam (Jesus soncompletely with one unfair dismissal going in Barbados'
of Mary)--He chose an elite list of 12, and onedirection. Not that the outcome would have been any
betrayed him for money.different, but it killed the spirit of the game---similar
In St. Lucia years ago, a local bowler missed histo what happened with Bucknor's bumbling during the
chance at fame when he cleaned bowled an English2007 World Cup final in Barbados.
test icon with the first ball. The occasion was a visitIn Test Cricket it is even worse. How can you have
from an English touring club. When he asked themen in their late 60's and 70's using their eyes only to
umpire afterwards why he called no-ball when hisdecide the fate of players' future? It appears to me
foot was behind the crease, the umpire simply said,that the implanting of their autocratic "Elite List" of
"People packed the stadium to see their British testinfallible Mt. Olympians is their way of saying: "we
heroes. They can see you bowl anytime."control this game... do as we say or we will not
Viv Richards, arguably one of the worlds' most prolificsanction you." I will predict this much. Within three
cricketers, was robbed of hundreds or evenyears, you will either have wholesale rebellion in test
thousands of runs because of badcricket, leaving only the shorter 2020 versions (which
decisions-accidental or otherwise. He was so fearedthey do not control) or they must upgrade and use
that whenever he visited a host country to play,modern technology.
most appeals against him for LBW were granted byOn 12 March-this past month, the ICC sent out a
the host nations. To minimize accidentallypress release to the effect that they have "selected
unfavourable decisions--which were frequent duringtheir best 8 cricket umpires in the world." The new
his career-- he would take his guard on the leg"elite panel" members consist of: Steve Bucknor from
stump, and then move six inches outside the samethe West Indies, Asoka De Silva from Sri lanka, Daryl
leg stump, giving all bowlers full view of his threeHarper from Australia, Rudi Koertzen from, South
stumps. His lightning quick reflexes did to balls outsideAfrica, Dave Orchard from South Africa, David
off, what lizards long tongues do to insects outsideShepherd from England, Russell Tiffin from
their reach. When he did that, questionable stumpingZimbabwe, and Srinivas Venkataraghavan from India.
decisions were the umpires' next weak areas. In oneTwo umpires from the Elite Panel will stand in all
game I saw, he leaned back to late cut and haltedfuture Test matches and there will be one member
the stroke when he saw the keeper's snout hangingstanding with a home umpire for One Day
over his stumps. Had he executed the shot, he wouldInternationals. England's Peter Willey was invited to
have damaged the keeper. When the keeper caughtbecome a member of the panel, but after
the ball and knocked down the stumps, Viv wasconsiderable consideration, he declined the invitation.
given out stumped. He was, and still is one of theHe cited his stringent family commitments as reasons
players that believe when you are out, even whenfor declining the offer.
the umpire does not think so, you should walk. HeCommenting on the appointment of the game's
not only did that, but as captain of the West Indies,leading umpires, ICC Chief Executive Officer Malcolm
he enshrined that in his players.Speed said that umpiring at the highest level now has
That is a far cry from the collective behaviour ofto be a full time profession, rather than a part time
successive Australia teams, who have benefited fromjob. "The eight men chosen to join the Elite Panel are
not-so-subtle umpires' intimidation and players'all proven performers at Test level, who command
over-reaction. In the second test India vs. Australia, Ithe respect of the captains and players. All Test
waited for Andrew Symmonds to walk at least twicematch captains were asked to make nominations for
during the innings, and was very disappointed whenthe Panel on behalf of their teams. These
Australia ended with the victory and Andrew endedcontributions were given serious consideration in
with 137 not-out-absolutely disgraceful. My simplemaking the final choices from the current panel of 20
question is this: if all elite lists of selectees overinternational umpires." The other major factor in
centuries err, either accidentally or when enticed bychoosing the Panel were the marks achieved by
large financial rewards, why do officials whoindividual umpires over the past four years. Those
administer the game of cricket insist on shovingare the marks awarded by captains at the end of
down our throats the myth that their elite list iseach Test match, which assess the umpire's
beyond error or infiltration-deliberate or accidental?performance against a range of criteria.
The last India vs. Australia series is a perfect exampleAccording to Malcolm Speed, chairman of the ICC,
why we must rely on modern technology in a game"Umpiring is one of the toughest tasks in international
where one bad decision, much more many, can notsport and this panel represents the best decision
only influence the outcome of a series, but damagemakers in the game. Their skills will help improve the
the careers of professionals as well. For years, theoverall standard of umpiring at international level and
cricketing public swallowed hard when umpires erred,set an example for the next generation of top class
sometimes blatantly. However the just concludedumpires to follow." Final selection of the Panel was
test series Australia vs. India, the Indian fans saidmade jointly by Speed, together with Sunil Gavaskar,
"enough is enough." After watching AndrewChairman of the ICC's Cricket Committee-Playing.
Symmonds granted two not-out decisions in theMy question is still this: why not use modern
same innings, I am not afraid to say so in print "Itechnology, which they have, if they all agree that
supported the Indian fans 1000%."decision-making is tough? In Lawn Tennis, any player
ENOUGH IS ENOUGH.can request the assistance of technology when a
I would have thought that since the Stanford2020decision is in doubt. However there are restrictions as
and the Indian 2020 games are modern entities withto how many incorrect challenges you are allowed.
new rules, they would have replaced the dinosaur-eraWhy doesn't cricket borrow a page out of the lawn
system of "umpire's decision final" whether erroneoustennis manual? I am going to break with tradition. I
or not, with electronic monitoring--which they havewill keep saying that any system that leaves open
anyway. Every questionable decision should bethe possibility for men to err-regardless how
referred to the third umpire. A player should have thehonourable they might be, they will err. I am not
right to question decisions that could damage his orimplying that any member is shady; I am stating
her career.simply that it is impossible for a 21-year old to get
In the 2020 format of the game, how can you haveevery decision correct-much more a man in his
men using their eyes only to make split-seconddeclining years. Players' unions need to refuse to go
decisions when batsmen face youngsters bowlingon any tour unless they have options to appeal
white balls at night at speeds in excess of 100-milesquestionable decisions. After all, it is their careers at
per hour? That is an open invitation for erroneousstake.
decisions and they have been happening--often.