Kevin Peterson Playing Left Handed

Had Kevin Pietersen been caught in the deep wheninnocent aplomb, for those who believe the shots
playing the first 'wrong handed switch shot', thewere unfair and possibly illegal; he says "stupid" and
other day, those same people who condemned thereminds them that innovation should be applauded.
shot would be the first to call for his internationalThe shots certainly had the Durham crowd applauding
head, on the grounds of poor shot selection andand few could have come away from that game
batting irresponsibility. It is doubtful however thatwithout a smile on their face and something to talk
they would be condemning the shot as illegal, asabout at work the following day. Even Scott Styris,
often the legality of a failed innovation is generallythe New Zealand bowler so badly savaged by the
ignored - that is often the way for those withtwo shots, was unable to keep a straight face, his
negative instincts. The innovative shot however, wassmile of admiration after watching the second six
not caught in the deep, instead it sailed over thedisappear into the afternoon sky said it all.
head of the lone fielder on the boundary, over theWhen the decision on the fairness or legality of the
ropes and has now landed it seems, into the handsshots is finally made, it could of course be too late.
of the cricket lawmakers and it appears that at theHuge changes in the cricketing world are imminent
moment they have not dropped it.and the commercial interests and the cash incentives
Of course Pietersen could have applied through thethey carry will far outweigh traditional cricketing
cricketing chain of command for permission to playculture. Innovation demonstrated in the midst of
such a shot in advance. Had he have done so, theythese changes, such as the two controversial
would probably still be in the middle of a secondheadline making Pietersen sixes, could easily put him
adjournment in the decision making progress. Theon top of the cricketing superstar wanted list - if of
controversial shot, that was followed by a secondcourse he is not there already. It is 'music to the
identical stroke, with the same result a short whileears' of those who want to monopolise and change
later, was played with such complete spontaneity,the game so completely. Their thinking will be that
with outrageous flair and match winning devastationshot making sells tickets and that will always be the
has had a profound effect both on and off the pitch.only consideration.
It has, it appears, forced the lawmakers to hurry toPietersen and the two wrong handed sixes could
their boardrooms for some umms and arrrs, whilehave a much bigger effect on the game then is he
outside the cricketing media publicly debate the issuerealised when making them. There is also online
and whip up a frenzy of opinion all at a time whenbetting interest from the leading bookmakers
the traditional values of the game are under theregarding how many runs he will score in the next
commercial microscope.cricket match using this shot.
Pietersen meanwhile defends his actions with