Convergence of Media

Introduction to convergence:against ordinary consumers who are also creating
The Gutenberg era is over. A new digitalcontent. Brands no longer know exactly which sector
communications technology has emerged.they are operating in, whom they are competing
Convergence is presented as a technological forceagainst and with what tools.
majeure. In the 21st century it seems nearlyFurthermore, convergence makes life more
impossible to follow developments in technology,complicated for publishers because they have to
business or journalism without encountering the wordreact to other competitors and changing needs and
convergence. An electronic superhighway is beginningchanging media usage of their usage target groups.
to girdle the globe as voice; video and data 
converge, bringing in their wake a new basket ofRegulation and Legal Aspects:
digital, multimedia and interactive communicationConvergence presents a challenge for broadcasting
technologies.policy. Technological change is a feature of the media
The term convergence has often been used overindustries, but shifts in technology and the
the last decade to describe the processes throughemergence of new media markets have created
which technologies, such as computers, telephony,new uncertainties. The pace of technological change
and broadcasting have come together to spark thein media and communications may increase in nearby
so-called ‘communication revolution’. It bringsfuture. For example, the consequences for
things together in a common format or in the samebroadcasting policy of cheap, ubiquitous, international
space. In common parlance, it means the coalescencebroadband networks would be far reaching.
and melting of traditionally separated communications.Technology change has ramifications for many
It denotes a general phenomenon- the ongoingspecific areas of media regulation, access to
effects of digital technology in media andspectrum, the definition of digital television services,
communications. The features of convergence areownership and control, and content regulation.
that it is driven by technology, is a powerful forceThe convergence of the telecommunications
for change, and is global, prospective andnetworks, media distribution networks, and the
unpredictable.internet during the last decade raises important
There is a strong sense of proliferating links withinquestions about where the locus of control ought to
the communications sector, telecommunicationlie with respect to these converged networks, the
companies, print media organizations, internet servicelevel of control that governments and others ought
providers, and information publishers and suppliers,to exert, and the relationship between national and
among many other parts are part of this sector. Theinternational law. To date, regulatory regimes have
traditional boundaries that circumscribed the roles oftreated three modes of communication very
traditional stakeholders in the news media no longerdifferently. First, the law has treated the transmission
exist. This revolution has been greatly hyperbolizedof voice and data over the traditional telephony
by a number of influential commentators in industry,networks as subject to substantial national regulation
government and academia.and certain international coordination. Second, the law
Convergence has been most manifest in the digitalhas considered content transmitted over myriad
communications environment with the merging of thenetworks as subject to a separate regime of media
computer, television, and telecommunicationslaws. Third, communications over internet protocol
industries. Those vying for a slice of the marketbased networks have, in their history, often been left
include telephone, cable television, entertainment,largely unregulated, for a variety of reasons, in an
broadcasting, and newspaper companies, as well asovertly legal sense, but subject to many less formal
satellite, software and computer companies. One oftypes of regulation by private and public entities.
the fundamental drivers of this convergence isThe growth of the importance and the scope of the
reader’s demand for access to content anytime,internet, as well as its growing ability to transmit rich
anywhere.data streams across geographic boundaries, present
 a conundrum for the law by causing a convergence
 of technologies and challenging the old nation state
Effects of convergence:based regulatory regime.
At its most general, convergence is the breakingThere are several issues that affect the choice of
down of old barriers that once divided communicationpolicies that govern the traditional communications
along several dimensions: between industry andnetworks and internet protocol-based technologies.
industry; between applications and applications;Chief among these issues is whether
between producer and consumer; and betweentelecommunications and media law and policy should
country and country. A change is taking place in thebe applied to internet-based technologies as it is;
consumption of media technologies. Consumptionwhether the telecommunications and media rules
convergence makes a move away from theshould be adapted to the new environment and then
traditional mode of media consumption. What wasapplied to the converged technologies; or whether
once a solitary and singular activity, e.g., early radioseparate regulatory regimes should exist to cover
listening, has changed into a shared, collectivethese two types of networks differently. Changes in
experience not just of media content reception butcommunications technology will require policy
also in the form of media texts received. Whatresponses.
makes consumption convergence unique is that theThe directions and speed of convergence are unclear,
user is paying attention and is alert to competingbut the fact of continuing change in the media and
media at the one time. With the convergence oftelecommunications industries is certain. Unlike
media technologies, early research in the fieldtelecommunications, broadcasting policy has been,
suggests that the use and consumption of mediaand continues to be, characterized by highly
technologies, both old and new, is being irrevocablyprescriptive regulation. The legislation concerning the
transformed. Competing newspapers and televisionintroduction of digital television attempts to mandate
stations from alliances to meet a variety ofspecific television formats and services.
technological, editorial, regulatory and market-based 
opportunities and challenges. Today, mediaConvergence law in India:
convergence is sparking a range of social, political,The Supreme Court in the case of Secretary of the
economic and legal disputes because of the conflictingMinistry of IB v. The Cricket Association of Bengal[1],
goals of consumers, producers and gatekeepers.for the first time went into the dynamics of
With media convergence, new forms of media useelectronic media. The case related to the denial of
have emerged: users can enhance a media encounterup- linking facility to private broadcasting company, to
by controlling the streams of information and havewhich the Board of Cricket in India had given right to
the ability to interact with not only the media itself,telecast cricket matches. The decision held in this
but also the content provider and other users. Thecase laid down the foundation of the autonomy of
implication is that consumers are becoming less andthe broadcasting media in the country. The court
less dependent on any single media type and less anddeclared in clear words that Air Waves are public
less loyal to any single media type. They can getproperty and their use is to be in public interest and
what they need when they need it from whatevercalled upon the Parliament to enact the separate
media source is available.Broadcasting act in the country. The judgement thus
 forms the genesis of Convergence in country.
Benefits of convergence:Subsequently various acts to regulate Cable TV and
Media content creators could take advantage of thisBroadcasting Bill along with the notification of the
opportunity to make content that is specificallyPrasar Bharti came to be of much importance. The
designed for consumption in a particular context,Broadcasting Bill of 1997 is a step towards providing a
especially novel or unusual contexts. For contentregulatory mechanism to supervise the growing
providers, media convergence also implies thatbroadcasting media.
creative content will only have to be created once,In December 1998, a group under the chairmanship
not several times for the varying media formats. Thisof the Finance Minister to expeditiously implement the
too, will save content providers time and money intelecom policy 1999 whilst taking into account the
the long run.increasing convergence between telecom and IT.
For content providers, the switch to convergentAccordingly, a group on Telecom and IT
media may initially be expensive, as they will have toconvergence was duly constituted under the
invest in new equipment. But in the long run, it willchairmanship of the Finance Minister by Government
open up more possibilities. As of now, televisionof India notification dated December 13, 1999. The
advertisements are usually very elaborate, but thegroup recommended the formulation and
experience is very passive. Viewers cannot simplyimplementation of Communication Convergence Bill,
click on them if they want more information or want2000 which is still pending in the Parliament.
to purchase the item being mentioned as they can 
on the internet. With converged media, it would beConclusion:
possible to integrate both types of advertisementIt can be inferred that convergence is still in its
into one, allowing for both elaborate presentationsbeginning stages and for complete digital
and complex interactions. The addition ofconvergence to become reality; we’ll need to
informational bits to the media stream, in combinationsee technological changes in every stage of the
with these all-in-one devices, will allow content to beinformation infrastructure.
more customized to the viewer’s needs andConvergence is here to stay and former ‘single
wants. The device may have some sort of filteringmedia’ publishers have to transform themselves
agent that only displays advertisements that are ofto Information Providers or Entertainment Providers.
interest of the viewers.Media industry is one of the most growing branches
 but existing players have to adapt to changing needs
Views against convergence:and to changing media usage and the new players
Convergence created unpredictability. Earlier thewould have to look for co-operations or acquisitions
behaviour of the media consumers could be predictedwithin the traditional business.
with some degree of accuracy. But in the new worldThere is need for implementing the convergence law
of converged media technologies and content, it isconsidering the vast technological developments
far more difficult to predict which of the many mediataking place in the field and to govern the use of
types any demographic will be paying attention to atemerging technologies in telecom, information
any given time. The options are far more numerous,technology, and broadcasting. With technology
which makes for a huge range of permutations.blurring the lines between telecommunication and
Convergence brings a further complication; it meansbroadcasting, a comprehensive law governing both is
the owned/branded content is likely to be sharingimperative. Thus the Communication Convergence Bill
space with unbranded or consumer-created content,of 2000 should be brought into effect immediately to
especially on interactive technologies such as aregulate the scenario of convergence in the country.
computer or a cell phone. The consumer-createdServices should be technology agnostic, not
content may be a text message or an e-mail, blog orhampered by overly expensive charges such as
instant chat. The fact that consumers themselveslicence fees or other imposts that tilt the playing field
can create and distribute media content makes thingsin favour of any one technology over the other.
even more predictable, especially for branded mediaUnified licensing, greater flexibility in spectrum
content. The branded content owners do not justallocation and reduction in license fee are all
have to compete against each other; they also havecommendable suggestions and need to be considered
to compete for consumer’s time and attentionon a priority basis.